| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| == Swing vs. SWT == | |
| Line 9: | Line 10: |
|
== Wafer == [http://www.waferproject.org/ Wafer] is "a research project which compares the many open source web application frameworks which are available using a common example application." Looks interesting. == Jakarta Struts == |
|
| Line 11: | Line 16: |
| [http://www.waferproject.org/ Wafer] is "a research project which compares the many open source web application frameworks which are available using a common example application." Looks interesting. |
== SiteMesh == S''''''iteMesh is an alternative to Jakarta Tiles. * http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd?anchor=use_sitemesh_to_decorate_multiple * http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd?anchor=sitemesh_passed_the_10_minute * http://www.opensymphony.com/sitemesh/ |
Building a Graphical User Interface in Java
local application
Swing vs. SWT
I've used Swing a bit, and haven't gotten around to trying SWT. Can someone give me a synopsis of the differences?
web application
Wafer
[http://www.waferproject.org/ Wafer] is "a research project which compares the many open source web application frameworks which are available using a common example application." Looks interesting.
Jakarta Struts
Jakarta Struts makes you work awfully hard to do something simple. I don't like the way that additions and changes require touching so many files. Perhaps on a large project, with separate teams for various tasks (not the way I would separate into teams, given my druthers), the complexity of Struts is justified by its power.
SiteMesh
SiteMesh is an alternative to Jakarta Tiles.